The rubric of evaluation of the competence in written expression. Perception of the students about its functionality
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article presents a research in which rubrics’ functionality for the assessment of competence in writing of college students is analyzed. The research is approached from a descriptive and quantitative methodology by means of the elaboration of a questionnaire in which, after performing the statistical tests to verify the reliability of the scale created, the perception of the students is shown in three moments of the writing process (before, during and after). The results show that rubrics are especially beneficial to encourage objectivity, self-assessment and unity of action.
Article Details
DOI https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2017.16.2.1349The articles published at Ocnos will have a Creative Common Licence Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported
References
Álvarez, O., & Ramírez, A. (2006). Impacto de una experiencia de producción textual mediada por tecnologías de información y comunicación en las nociones sobre el valor epistémico de la escritura. Revista Educación y Pedagogía, 18(46), 223-238.
Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubricreferenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 27(2), 3-13. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x
Bhatia, V.K. (1999). Integrating products, processes, purposes and participants in professional writing. En C.N. Candlin, & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices (pp. 21-39). London: Longman. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315840390-2
Beaugrande, R.A., & Dressler, W.U. (1982). Introducción a la lingüística del texto. Barcelona: Ariel.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum.
Boekaerts, P.R., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50030-5
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964309
Candlin, C., & Hyland, K. (Eds.) (1999). Writing: text, processes and practices. New York: Longman.
Cano, E. (2008). La evaluación por competencias en la educación superior. Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 12(3), 1-16.
Cebrián, M. (2009). Formative and peer-to-peer evaluation using a rubric tool. En A. Méndez-Vilas, A. Solano-Martín, & J.A. Mesa-González, Research, Reflections and Innovations in Integrating ICT in Education (pp. 60-64). Badajoz: Formatex. Recuperado de http://www.formatex.org/micte2009/book/Index.pdf
Coulthard, M. (1994). Advances in Written Text Analysis. London: Routledge.
Díaz-Barriga, F., & De-laCruz, G. (2011). Las rúbricas en la evaluación de competencias y aprendizaje complejo: sus alcances y restricciones en educación Superior. En Bujan, K. (Coord.), La evaluación de competencias en educación superior. Las rúbricas como instrumento de evaluación (pp. 13-35). Madrid: Eduforma.
Fagerheim, B., & Shrode, F. (2009). Information literacy rubrics within the disciplines. Communications in Information Literacy, 3(2), 158-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2010.3.2.78
Farr, B.P., & Trumbull, E. (1997). Assessment alternatives for diverse classrooms. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Fernández, A. (2010). La evaluación orientada al aprendizaje en un modelo de formación por competencias en la educación universitaria. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 8(1), 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2010.6216
Garello, M.V., & Rinaudo, M.C. (2013). Autorregulación del aprendizaje, feedback y transferencia de conocimiento. Investigación de diseño con estudiantes universitarios. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 15(2), 131-147. Recuperado de http://redie.uabc.mx/vol12no1/contenido-garellorinaudo.html
Gerard, F.M. (2008). Evaluer competences. Guide pratique. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Gómez, A., & Suárez, L. (2009). Evaluación de reportes de resolución de problemas: uso de la rúbrica. En P. Lestón, Acta Latinoamericana de Matemática Educativa (pp. 391-398). México: Comité Latinoamericano de Matemática Educativa A.C.
Gottlie, M. (2006). Assessing English language learners: Bridges from language proficiency to academic achievement. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R.B. (1996). Theory & Practice of Writing. London: Longman.
Hayes J.R., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the Organization of Writing Processes. En L.W. Gregg, & E.R. Steinberg, Cognitive Processes in Writing (pp. 3-30). New Jersey: Lawrence Erbaum Associates Publishers.
Ibarra, M.S., Rodríguez, G., & Gómez, M.A. (2012). La evaluación entre iguales: beneficios y estrategias para su práctica en la universidad. Revista de Educación (359), 206-231. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10-4438/1988-592X-RE-2010-359-092
Jönsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130-144. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
López-Pastor, V. (2009). Evaluación formativa y compartida en educación superior. Madrid: Narcea.
Mansilla, V.B., Duraisingh, E.D., Wolfe, C.R., & Haynes, C. (2009). Targeted assessment rubric: An empirically grounded rubric for interdisciplinary writing. The Journal of Higher Education, 80, 334-353. Recuperado de http://www. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2009.11779016
interdisciplinarystudiespz.org/pdf/VBM-et.al_Targeted-assessment_2008.pdf
Martínez, E., & Raposo, M. (2011). La rúbrica en la enseñanza universitaria: un recurso para la tutoría de grupos de estudiantes. Formación universitaria, 4(4), 19-28.
Martínez-Figueira, E., Tellado-González, F., & Raposo-Rivas, M. (2013). La rúbrica como instrumento para la autoevaluación: un estudio piloto. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 11(2), 373-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2013.5581
Martín-Monje, E., Vázquez-Cano, E., & Fernández, M. (2015). Peer assessment of language learning resources in virtual learning environments with e-rubrics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 6(4), pp. 321-342. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2014.069018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2014.069018
Navarrete, C., & Gustke, C. (1996). A guide to performance assessment for linguistically diverse students. Albuquerque: New Mexico Highlands University.
Nystrand, M. (1982). Rhetoric’s audience and linguistics speech community: implications for understanding writing, reading, and text. En Nystrand, M. (Ed.), What writers know. The language, process, and structure of written discourse (pp. 1-28). New York: Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004454118_005
Oakleaf, M. (2009). Using Rubrics to Assess Information Literacy: An Examination of Methodology and Interrater Reliability. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(5), 969-983. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.2103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21030
Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: Theoretical and Practical Connotations. When it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(2), 551-576. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.42.16062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.30.12200
Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. (2014). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts: effects on first year university students’ self-regulation and performance. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 37(1), 149-183. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v5n4a1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2014.881655
Panadero, E., & Jönsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129-144. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
Panadero, E., & Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 133-148. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872
Pérez A., & Zamudio, G. (1996). Evaluación escolar, ¿resultados o procesos?, investigación, reflexión y análisis crítico. Bogotá: Cooperativa Editorial Magisterio.
Raposo, M., & Martínez, E. (2011). La rúbrica en la enseñanza universitaria: un recurso para la tutoría de grupos de estudiantes. Formación universitaria, 4(4), 19-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062011000400004
Reddy, Y.M. (2007). Effect of rubrics on enhancement of student learning. Educate, 7(1), 3-17.
Reddy, Y.M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435-448. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859
Rychen, D.S., & Salganik L.H. (Eds.) (2006). Definir y seleccionar las competencias fundamentales para la vida. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Scallon, G. (2000). L’évaluation formative. Bruxelles: De Boeck Université.
Scallon, G. (2004). L’evaluation des competences et l`importance du jugement. Pédagogie collégiale, 18(1), 14-20.
Stevens, D.D., & Levi, A. (2005). Introduction to rubrics. An Assessment Tool to Save Grading Time, Convey Effective Feedback, and Promote Student Learning. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
Vargas (2005). Escribir en la universidad: reflexiones sobre el proceso de composición escrita de textos académicos. Lenguaje, 33, 97-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25100/lenguaje.v33i0.4818
Vázquez-Cano, E., Martín-Monje, E., & Fernández, M. (2014). El rol de las e-rúbricas en la evaluación de materiales digitales para la enseñanza de lenguas en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 12, 135-157. doi: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2014.6414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2014.6414