Integration of narration and argumentation in the retelling of narrative texts
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this article is to analyse the presence of narrative structural elements of the history of a children's literary text in children's stories, analyse the argumentative schemes that they implement when they justify both the actions of the characters and their own positions on what happened in the story. Forty five students, 25 girls and 20 boys between 6 and 10 years old participated in this research (M = 8.10, SD = 0.9); from first to fifth grade of the elementary school of a school in the city of Bogotá (Colombia). The corpus used in this report was composed of 1152 statements in 655 speaking turns. The quantitative analyses through chi-square account for significant differences for the mean of narrative structural elements, narrative categories and argumentative schema by grade level. The results are discussed highlighting that the use of narration and argumentation converges gradually and that these types of discourse together favour the re-tellings of narrative texts.
Article Details
DOI https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2020.19.1.2131The articles published at Ocnos will have a Creative Common Licence Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported
References
Alam, F., & Rosemberg, C. R. (2014). Narración y disputas entre niños. Un análisis de argumentaciones tempranas. Cogency, 6(1), 9-31. http://www.cogency.udp.cl/index.php/cogency/article/view/133
Bassols, M., & Torrent, A. M. (1997). Modelos textuales: Teoría y práctica. Barcelona: Eumo.
Berland, L., & Lee, V. (2012). In pursuit of consensus: Disagreement and legitimization during small-group argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1857-1882. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.645086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.645086
Bornstein, M. H., Putnick, D. L., & Esposito, G. (2017). Continuity and stability in development. Child Development Perspectives, 11(2), 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12221
Coolican, H. (2017). Research methods and statistics in psychology. New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203769836 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203769836
Correa, M. (2013). La narrativa y su poética: brújula y camino para la formación inicial de los niños. En R. Flórez, & M. C. Torrado (Eds.), Primera infancia, lenguajes e inclusión social: Una mirada desde la investigación (pp. 183-200). Bogotá, Colombia: Ediciones USTA.
Drijbooms, E., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Children's use of evaluative devices in spoken and written narratives. Journal of Child Language, 44(4), 767-794. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000234 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000234
Ducrot, O. (2004). Argumentation rhétorique et argumentation linguistique. En M. Doury, & S. Moirand (Comps.), L’argumentation aujourd’hui. Positions théoriques en confrontation (pp. 17-34). París, Francia: Presses Sorbonne Nouvelle. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.psn.756
Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2008). Argumentation in science education. Perspectives from classroom-based research. Dordrecht, Países Bajos: Springer.
Frizelle, P., Thompson, P.A., McDonald, D., & Bishop, D.V. M. (2018). Growth in syntactic complexity between four years and adulthood: evidence from a narrative task. Journal of Child Language, 45(5), 1174-1197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000918000144 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000918000144
Garcia‐Mila, M., Gilabert, S., Erduran, S., & Felton, M. (2013). The effect of argumentative task goal on the quality of argumentative discourse. Science Education, 97(4), 497-523. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21057
Greco, S. (2018). Designing dialogue: Argumentation as conflict management in social interaction. Revue Tranel, 68, 7-15. http://doc.rero.ch/record/322610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26034/tranel.2018.2842
Greimas, A. J. (1973). En torno al sentido: ensayos semióticos. Madrid: Fragua.
Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6ª ed.). México: Editorial McGraw-Hills.
Hinojosa, F. (2016). La peor señora del mundo. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, Reino Unido: University Cambridge Press.
Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., & Khait, V. (2016). Dialogic argumentation as a bridge to argumentative thinking and writing. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 39(1), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2015.1111608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2015.1111608
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Legare, C. H., Sobel, D. M., & Callanan, M. (2017). Causal learning is collaborative: Examining explanation and exploration in social contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(5), 1548-1554. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1351-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1351-3
Macagno, F., & Walton, D. (2015). Classifying the patterns of natural arguments. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 48, 26–53. https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.48.1.0026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/philrhet.48.1.0026
Migdalek, M. J., Rosemberg, C. R., & Yáñez, C. S. (2014). La génesis de la argumentación. Un estudio con niños de 3 a 5 años en distintos contextos de juego. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 19(3), 251-267. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v19n3a03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v19n3a03
Peña, I. (2010). El universo de la creación narrativa. Bogotá, Colombia: Ediciones El Huaco.
Plantin, C. (2014). Dictionnaire de l’argumentation - Une introduction notionnelle aux études d’argumentation. Lyon, Francia: ENS Editions.
Pontecorvo, C., & Arcidiacono, F. (2010). Development of reasoning through arguing in young children. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 4, 19-29. http://psyjournals.ru/files/32800/kip_2010_4_Pontecorvo.pdf
Prat, C. S., Seo, R., & Yamasaki, B. L. (2016). The role of individual differences in working memory capacity on reading comprehension ability. En P. Afflerbach (Ed.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Reading: Reader, Text, and Context (pp. 331–347). Nueva York, Estados Unidos: Routledge.
Rapanta, C., & Macagno, F. (2016). Argumentation methods in educational contexts: Introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 142-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.03.006
Rose, L., & Fischer, K. (2011). Intelligence in Childhood. En R. J. Sternberg, & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence, (pp. 144-174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977244.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977244.009
Serrano, E. (2015). Narración, argumentación e identidad. Revista Nexus Comunicación, 16, 28-39. https://doi.org/10.25100/nc.v0i16.711 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25100/nc.v0i16.711
Spinillo, A. G., & Almeida, D. D. (2014). Compreendendo textos narrativo e argumentativo: há diferenças?. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, 66(3), 115-132. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/pdf/arbp/v66n3/10.pdf
Van-Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht, Países Bajos; Foris. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846089
Van-Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragmadialectical approach. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616389
Van-Eemeren, F.H., Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck, F. (2007). Argumentative indicators in discourse: A pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht, Países Bajos: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6244-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6244-5
Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2016). A classification system for argumentation schemes. Argument & Computation, 6(3), 219-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2015.1123772 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2015.1123772
Walton, D., Reed, C., & Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation schemes. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034
Westerveld, M. F., & Vidler, K. (2016). Spoken language samples of Australian children in conversation, narration and exposition. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18(3), 288-298. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2016.1159332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2016.1159332