Promoting resistant reading in university classrooms: Teaching resources and methodologies

Main Article Content

Jordi Serrano-Muñoz
Teresa Iribarren

Abstract

This study evaluates the impact of Literature and Male Violence: A Guide for Academic Research (Iribarren et al., 2023) on university students’ self-perceived access to relevant resources, knowledge of key gender studies concepts and forms of violence, and ability to identify male violence in literature. The study employed a longitudinal design with pre- and post-test surveys administered to students enrolled on a contemporary literature course. A secondary aim was to assess students’ perceptions of the innovativeness and usefulness of selected teaching exercises described in the Guide. The findings revealed a significant increase in access to resources on male violence, particularly among male-identifying students. Students also reported improved understanding of gender-related concepts and greater confidence in identifying violence in literary texts. Collaborative exercises were perceived as more innovative, while individual tasks were considered more useful for recognising violence. These results suggest that targeted educational resources can effectively promote resistant reading and enhance students’ gender awareness and analytical skill in literature courses. However, the limited sample size constrains the generalisability of the findings and underscores the need for further research across broader educational contexts.

Article Details

How to Cite
Serrano-Muñoz, J., & Iribarren, T. (2025). Promoting resistant reading in university classrooms: Teaching resources and methodologies. Ocnos. Journal of Reading Research, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.18239/ocnos_2026.25.1.560
Section
Artículos

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Assmann, A. (2013). Civilizing societies: Recognition and respect in the global world. New Literary History, 44(1), 69-91. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2013.0006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2013.0006

Alù, G., & Hill, S. P. (2021). Introduction: Writing and resisting violence against women. Italian Studies, 76(3), 302-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00751634.2021.1932047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00751634.2021.1932047

Ato, M., López-García, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511

Bonate, P. L. (2000). Analysis of pretest-posttest designs. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420035926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420035926

Brewster, A., & Kossew, S. (2019). Rethinking the victim. Gender and violence in contemporary Australian women’s writing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315107387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315107387

Brutus, S., Aguinis, H., & Wassmer, U. (2013). Self-reported limitations and future directions in scholarly reports: Analysis and recommendations. Journal of Management, 39(1), 48-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312455245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312455245

Chasteen, S. V., & Chattergoon, R. (2020). A comparison study of pre/post-test and retrospective pre-test for measuring faculty attitude change. 2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.Chasteen DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2019.pr.Chasteen

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques. J. Wiley & Sons.

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

Dowler, L., Cuomo, D., & Laliberte, N. (2014). Challenging ‘The Penn State Way’: A feminist response to institutional violence in higher education. Gender, Place & Culture, 21(3), 387-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2013.802676 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2013.802676

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2015). Comparison of convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Fetterley, J. (1978). The resisting reader. A feminist approach to American fiction. Indiana University Press.

Holland, M. K., & Hewett, H. (Eds.) (2021). #MeToo and literary studies. Reading, writing, and teaching about sexual violence and rape culture. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501372773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501372773

Iribarren, T., Canadell, R., & Fernàndez, J. A. (Eds.) (2021). Narratives of violence. Edizioni Ca’ Foscari. http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-460-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-460-8

Iribarren, T., Gatell-Perez, M., Serrano-Muñoz, J., & Clua-Fainé, M. (2023). Literatura y violencia machistas. Guía para trabajos académicos. Edizioni Ca’ Foscari. https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-747-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-747-0

Iribarren, T., Serrano-Muñoz, J., Gatell-Perez, M., & Clua-Fainé, M. (2024). La revisión por pares síncrona en el aula virtual: Leer críticamente la representación literaria de violencias contra las mujeres. En S. Urbina, G. Tur, J. Moreno, & J. Munar (Eds.), Tecnologías digitales para una práctica educativa inclusiva y creativa: Hacia la competencia digital docente y ciudadana. (pp. 235-248). Dykinson. https://doi.org/10.14679/2688 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14679/2688

López, M. E., & Hart, S. M. (2022). Gender violence in twenty-first-century Latin American women’s writing. Boydell & Brewer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781800104686 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781800104686

Marsden, E., & Torgerson, C. J. (2012). Single group, pre- and post-test research designs: Some methodological concerns. Oxford Review of Education, 38(5), 583-616. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.731208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.731208

Mann, P. S., & Lacke, C. J. (2010). Introductory statistics. John Wiley & Sons.

Meza, P., & González, M. (2020). Construction and validation of the self-efficacy scale for disciplinary academic writing. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1830464. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1830464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1830464

ONU Mujeres. (18 noviembre 2019). Dieciséis maneras de enfrentarte a la cultura de la violación. ONU Mujeres. https://www.unwomen.org/es/news/stories/2019/11/compilation-ways-you-can-stand-against-rape-culture

Pena, N. (2019). Por una desobediencia lectora. Paradigma. Revista universitaria de cultura, 22, 114-117. https://hdl.handle.net/10630/17705

UOC. (s.f.). Perfil de l’estudiantat. Portal de transparencia. UOC. https://www.uoc.edu/portal/ca/transparencia/docencia/perfil-estudiant/index.html

Rakhimova-Sommers, E. (Ed.) (2021). Teaching Nabokov’s Lolita in the #MeToo Era. Lexington Books. https://doi.org/10.5771/9781793628398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9781793628398

Rockwell, S. K., & Kohn, H. (1989). Post-then-pre-evaluation. Journal of Extension, 27(2). https://open.clemson.edu/joe/vol27/iss2/8

Sevillano-Monje, V., Martín-Gutiérrez, Á., & Hervás-Gómez, C. (2022). The Flipped Classroom and the development of competences: A teaching innovation experience in Higher Education. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040248

Tamas, J. (2023). Au NON des femmes. Libérer nos classiques du regard masculin. Seuil.

Thapar-Björkert, S., Samelius, L., & Sanghera, G. S. (2016). Exploring symbolic violence in the eEveryday: Misrecognition, condescension, consent and complicity. Feminist Review, 112(1), 144-162. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2015.53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2015.53

Thomas, D. M., & Kim, J. K. (2019). Impact of literature circles in the developmental college classroom. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 49(2), 89-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2019.1582371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2019.1582371

Wilkinson, E. (2025). Feminist pedagogy in the neoliberal university: on violence, vulnerability and radical care. Gender and Education, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2025.2471286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2025.2471286

Zachariah, T. Z., Izahar, M., Elias, Z., & Zabit, M. N. M. (2022). Using group work to teach literature in an online classroom environment. KnE Social Sciences, 7(7), 131-141. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i7.10657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i7.10657